“Struggle over Family Fortune: Ailing Feinstein at the Center of Legal Battle”Dianne Feinstein

Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California has been facing public challenges regarding her health and ability to continue her career in politics. As she approaches the end of her long and illustrious tenure as a lawmaker and former mayor of San Francisco, she is also dealing with legal and financial conflicts involving her daughter, Katherine Feinstein, and her late husband’s three daughters from a previous marriage.

One of the disputes revolves around the sale of a beach house in a posh area called Stinson Beach, located north of San Francisco. Additionally, there is a disagreement over the distribution of the life insurance proceeds of Feinstein’s late husband, Richard C. Blum, who was a wealthy financier. Feinstein claims she needs the money to cover her increasing medical expenses. These issues have led to tensions within the family and are being closely watched by the public.

For those who are close to Feinstein, the ongoing struggle over Richard C. Blum’s estate has added to a recent and unfortunate chapter in her life, marring the final stages of her otherwise successful public career and raising concerns about her ability to handle her personal affairs.

Jerry Roberts, the author of the biography “Dianne Feinstein: Never Let Them See You Cry,” published in 1994, remarks that the financial conflict has made the end of her career disheartening for those who knew her during her high points in politics.

Feinstein comes from a wealthy background and has consistently been among the wealthiest members of Congress. When she married Blum in 1980, she was already financially well-off. As a Senator, she placed her securities into a blind trust valued between $5 million and $25 million, according to her most recent financial disclosure as required by lawmakers.

Together, Dianne Feinstein and Richard C. Blum experienced a significant increase in wealth, surpassing even Feinstein’s previous standard of living. Their main residence is an expansive 9,500-square-foot mansion located in the affluent San Francisco neighborhood of Pacific Heights. In addition to this, they owned vacation properties such as the 36-acre Bear Paw Ranch in Aspen, Colorado, which was sold in March for over $25 million, and a seven-bedroom compound in Lake Tahoe, which sold in late 2021 for a reported $36 million. They currently possess properties on the Hawaiian island of Kauai and in Washington, D.C.

However, amidst the disputes over Blum’s estate, there have been questions raised about the true extent of his fortune and the out-of-pocket expenses for the home health care that Feinstein required following her bout with shingles earlier in the year. These matters have added complexity and tension to the ongoing legal and financial conflicts within the family.

During his life, Richard C. Blum, who was Dianne Feinstein’s third husband and a private equity magnate, was often portrayed in public accounts as a billionaire. However, people familiar with the family’s financial situation dispute this characterization, asserting that Blum’s wealth was actually less than some had believed. Blum’s friends have mentioned that the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted his investments, particularly his extensive holdings in hotels.

As for Dianne Feinstein, she is currently 90 years old and serving her sixth term in the Senate. Her health has been fragile for a long time, and she has been experiencing increasing issues with memory and cognition. Earlier this year, she returned to work after being absent for several months due to shingles and related complications. Colleagues were shocked to observe her further decline. In the Senate, she relies on a team of aides to support her in performing her duties, even though there have been calls for her to step down before her term concludes after the next year’s election.

The two lawsuits were brought forth by Katherine Feinstein, who is Dianne Feinstein’s only child and holds power of attorney over her mother’s legal matters. The first lawsuit revolves around a beach house that is in disrepair. Dianne Feinstein no longer wishes to use it and intends to sell it during the summer or fall.

In the past, the beach house served as a special retreat for Feinstein, offering solace from the demanding world of politics. After losing the race for governor of California in 1990, she sought refuge there. The three-bedroom property faces Bolinas Lagoon and sits on nearly half an acre of sandy land within a gated community. Over the years, the neighborhood has been home to a diverse range of residents, including old-money San Franciscans, artists, and celebrities like novelist Danielle Steel and members of The Grateful Dead. Recently, a similarly-sized house in the same community was sold for over $6 million.

The lawsuit also alleges that Blum’s daughters are attempting to utilize the beach house at Feinstein’s expense and limit her ability to sell portions of the trust to enhance the value of their inheritance after Feinstein’s passing.

The second lawsuit involves a dispute over the proper appointment of trustees and centers around the life insurance proceeds of Richard C. Blum. These funds are supposed to be disbursed through a trust. The lawsuit alleges that the trustees have withheld the funds and have not properly supported Dianne Feinstein, who has incurred significant medical expenses. Despite Blum’s supposed intent to provide financial support for his spouse after his death, the trustees have allegedly refused to make distributions to reimburse Senator Feinstein’s medical expenses.

In response to the lawsuit, the two trustees named in the case, Michael R. Klein and Marc T. Scholvinck, have denied any refusal to pay money to Feinstein. They are represented by attorney Steven P. Braccini, who suggests that Katherine Feinstein, a former Superior Court judge in San Francisco and Dianne Feinstein’s daughter, may be acting out of personal interests rather than solely on behalf of her mother. Braccini implies that Katherine Feinstein’s actions might not be entirely aligned with her mother’s best interests.

In response to the second lawsuit, attorney Steven P. Braccini, representing the trustees Michael R. Klein and Marc T. Scholvinck, expressed bewilderment about the filing. He stated that Richard Blum’s trust has never denied any disbursement to Senator Feinstein, including medical expenses.

Katherine Feinstein, who filed the lawsuit, did not respond to requests for comment.

Braccini’s statement mentioned that the trustees have not been provided with documentation proving that Katherine Feinstein has been appointed power of attorney. The statement also raised questions about Dianne Feinstein’s capacity to represent her own interests in the lawsuit, suggesting that it is unclear why a sitting United States senator would require someone to have power of attorney over her.

Braccini further expressed concern about the situation but remained hopeful that it could be resolved quickly. He implied that Katherine Feinstein’s actions might be misunderstood or misguided, suggesting that she may be attempting to gain control over trust assets to which she is not entitled.

Despite the family’s wealth, there have been concerns among friends and family members about how assets will be distributed. Dianne Feinstein and her daughter, Katherine, are reportedly worried about the significant cost of the extensive home care that Feinstein needs, which may not be fully covered by insurance.

During her recovery from shingles, Feinstein received full-time care from housekeepers and home health aides while being overseen by her daughter. Several family friends and advisors have confirmed this but wish to remain anonymous as they are not authorized to discuss the family’s affairs publicly.

When Feinstein returned to work, she was accompanied by a long-standing health aide during her time in Washington, according to two friends. Additionally, Katherine Feinstein and her husband have been assisting the senator in managing her personal finances for many years.

A representative for Dianne Feinstein, Adam Russell, stated that the matter is a private legal issue, and Senator Feinstein and her office will not be commenting on it.

Willie Brown, a former mayor of San Francisco and a close friend of the Feinstein family, shared his perspective on the situation. He believes that the financial dispute likely stems from longstanding animosity between Katherine Feinstein and Richard Blum’s three daughters. Brown suggested that if there was mutual love and understanding between all parties involved, there might not have been any issue.

Brown further praised Katherine Feinstein, describing her as a brilliant woman and judge. He believes that she must have had significant reasons for taking the steps she did, indicating that she likely acted in the best interest of her mother, Dianne Feinstein.

Leave a comment